NSI FRIENDS

NSI PODCASTS

 

NSI Research

HLF4 and the Future of the International Aid Architecture

Greater Influence, Greater Responsibility: Are INGOs' Self-Regulatory Accountability Standards Effective?

NSI Media

Time for a new deal for 'fragile states'

The Canadian behind the new Robin Hood tax

NSI Video

Canada's Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation people speak of their experiences with mining companies in:
Dealing Full Force (English)Dándole con todo (Spanish)

POLL
The term “development effectiveness” can currently be understood in more ways than one. If you had to offer a definition, would you primarily explain development effectiveness as:
Organizational effectiveness
Policy coherence
Overall development outcomes
Current results

Recently completed projects     [Previous]   [Home]

Finance, Debt, and Development Assistance


Title of Project Estimating revenue from an international foreign exchange transactions tax (Tobin tax)
Key Staff Involved Rodney Schmidt
Research Period July 2005 – December 2007
Output Published research report
Tobin’s tax is conceived as a percentage levy on foreign exchange transactions. It would be assessed on each conversion by large foreign exchange traders of domestic currency into any foreign currency, and collected by the domestic government or its designated international authority.

Because of the great volume of foreign exchange transactions in major currencies, Tobin’s tax can potentially raise a large revenue to finance global public goods or international development projects, such as the Millennium Development Goals. A new international tax is attractive in that it would broaden the tax base rather than raise tax rates. We need reliable estimates of revenue to find the appropriate tax rate and understand its impact on market liquidity, and to plan for a tax administrator and revenue allocation authority.

Earlier interest in Tobin’s tax identified evasion as a problem. We have since found a feasible way to collect the tax, through the globally integrated payments system used to settle inter-bank foreign exchange transactions in cash and other financial instruments. Tobin’s tax is then equivalent to the user fees, subsumed in the bid-ask spread, that administrators of payments systems routinely collect on individual financial transactions.

Initial methods to estimate Tobin tax revenue and the way it responds to changes in the tax rate were not convincing, depending simplistically on gross foreign exchange trading volume to the neglect of other contributors to market liquidity. The equivalence of Tobin’s tax to a transaction cost such as user fees suggests a new way to estimate the revenue elasticity, by looking at the behavior of the inter-bank bid-ask spread for major currencies. The spread reflects market liquidity (the greater the liquidity the smaller the spread) and responds to transaction costs and market risks, including foreign exchange, liquidity, credit, and settlement risks. One can estimate statistically the relative importance of each of these components and their interaction for the behavior of the spread and of trading volume. Then one can simulate how the spread and trading volume would respond to Tobin’s tax as a change in foreign exchange transaction costs.

Read the following report:

The Currency Transaction Tax: Rate and Revenue Estimates, by NSI Principal Researcher Rodney Schmidt - Finance and Debt  

 

 

© 2005 The North-South Institute